Is a

Notes and Themes Discussed

• Start: 10:30am EST
  • General topic: application of algorithmic governance and reputation systems in a variety of DAO’s, particularly as Algovera begins to establishes its own reputation system
• Thoughts on the reading: “Are “DAO’s” a Panopticon”?
  • Big Q: Is algorithmic governance just another flavor of authoritarian/behavior bending surveillance?
    • What would be an approach to create a “trustless” reputation system w/o monitoring?
      • Reputations work in small scales, contextually (that greek guy(?))
      • transitioning into a digital landscape, there is a permanence that is not found in the “village”
        • ex: ebay seller percentages (permanence, little possibility of remediation)
    • Sandboxing a reputation system:
      • Local to a context and scope (ex: juntos vs a meeting squad)
      • intent: surfacing individual info to the larger community to decide on coordination
    • Federated DAO’s and SubDAO’s
      • Reputational systems at various levels of organizational abstraction
    • The Question of reputation “score”:
      • How do we properly reflect social “value” added to a group?
      • A score appears simplistic
      • However, scores allow simple information indices about persons (again ebay satisfaction ratings, or yelp)
      • How tf do we measure energy/vibration?
        • could there be other myriad effects of plugging in subjective social-attestation scores into a algorithmic governance platform
        • A sandbox appears necessary